![]() ![]() ![]() I will leave you with those few points, but what does stand out is £300 vs FREE, unless you are doing loads of money making stuff, recouping your money is decidedly 'iffy' if you choose Photograv. You can make adjustments to the picture in the same environment as using it. The Gold Method, gets great results, just as fast. Negative side is that it's about £300 and with version 3.0 as I have mentioned, there were quite a few 'iffy' settings compared to the earlier version 2.11. Photograv, incredibly quick and great picture dithering for a number of different substrates. I think if it were me wondering about which would be the better to choose from, there are a few things in favour of both. Incidently on page two you will see some extremely fine examples of how a subject should be photographed, I really wish I could take photos like that. George Perzel posted a very fine example of work done with Photograv and the Gold Method. You can get very acceptable results using photoshop and the Gold method and with the added work of Doug Griffith, it really couldn't be easier. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |